Ercanbrack frames AI readiness around three sequential shifts and warns leaders they have roughly three years to make them.
1. The Mindset Shift
Fear is the first obstacle. Job displacement headlines dominate the conversation, and that noise makes people defensive. But Ercanbrack draws a historical parallel: workers who resisted the tractor lost ground; those who retrained as mechanics gained it. The same dynamic is playing out now.
What gets buried in the discourse is the opportunity side of the equation. As Ercanbrack puts it:
"The news doesn't talk about the hundreds of new jobs that have been created that need to be done in order to support and maintain this new imagined world of AI and humans working together."
The mindset shift isn't about accepting a threat. Recognizing that AI-native workers, those who can direct and manage digital workers, become more valuable rather than less is the real transition required.
2. Upskilling as Strategic Imperative
You can't hire your way into AI-native. There simply aren't enough qualified people, and even if there were, bringing in outside experts without upskilling your existing team creates gaps in institutional knowledge and execution.
At Vasion, that meant partnering with Utah Tech University to develop machine learning coursework, funding employee enrollment, and deploying Claude (Anthropic) broadly across the organization. But Ercanbrack is clear that tool access alone doesn't solve the problem. Structured enablement does.
The current initiative involves building templated digital workers that ship to every new employee on day one, paired with certifications and training that teach people how to manage them.
"Our objective this year is to have every single employee have at least one digital worker. I suspect we'll have lots that will have more than one digital worker, and we'll have those workers calling agents to do work."
The goal, as Ercanbrack frames it, is building judgment and not just technical proficiency.
3. Restructuring How Teams Operate
This step in the transformation causes the most friction for leadership. Traditional organizational siloes exist for good reasons: specialization, accountability, and clear ownership. But AI starts eroding the hard lines between functions.
"All of a sudden, those lines that sometimes actually get in the way and slow you down... all of a sudden start to gray a little bit. Because if I now have an agent, and my agent just can automatically talk to the marketing agent, all of a sudden, I can smooth that handoff out."
The logical endpoint is organizations structured around outcomes rather than functions. Ercanbrack goes further, predicting we'll see a one-person billion-dollar company within the foreseeable future, enabled entirely by orchestrated agents across every business function.
This shift doesn't just threaten individual contributors. It challenges leaders who've built careers on managing people and functions. The response, he argues, is the same: reimagine what you get to drive rather than defending what you've always done.