Every manufacturing organization deals with issues standing in the way of getting products developed and delivered, particularly for companies developing long-lifecycle products. One of the more daunting challenges involves documentation because manufacturing companies have a lot of it in different formats for different purposes, making it more difficult to track, update, and maintain. Those tasks alone are lofty, but when an unexpected documentation-related issue occurs, it can have far-reaching consequences.
For example, if a barcode printer goes offline, label output stops, which has a downstream impact on production that can sometimes take days to resolve. This translates to costly audits, inventory delays, and delayed shipments. It can even impact customer trust.
Businesses can't afford to let these events and delays undermine their operations. The research report, “The True Cost of Downtime 2024” from Siemens revealed that in the automotive industry alone, the cost of an idle production line at a big plant can add up to $695 million a year. The same report found that the world’s largest companies can lose 11% of their revenue due to downtime.
Root Causes of Workflow Delays
Delayed Documentation
Because documentation is a central component in manufacturing processes, much of the supply chain pivots on documents being accurate, complete, and expedited on time. However, throughout the course of document creation, review, revisions, approvals, and distribution, it’s not uncommon for documents or other printed materials to get misplaced, leading to rework and delayed product deliveries.
Incorrect Labels
Undiscovered misinformation, errors, or omissions on labels lead to costly issues, including rejected shipments, customer chargebacks, and relabeling expenses. A misprinted label might not be scannable at a critical section of the supply chain, requiring staff to manually enter the data—a process that is prone to errors. This can be particularly costly for companies in regulated industries as label issues can lead to noncompliance.
For example, food product recalls are common due to manufacturing errors where an incorrect or incomplete label was applied to the finished product. According to an analysis of FDA data, labelling errors were the leading cause of food recalls (192 out of 422) in 2024. Consequently, that can lead to supply chain bottlenecks, as well as costly recall expenses.
Software Malfunction or Incompatibility Issues
Manufacturers depend on ERP and customer relationship management (CRM) systems to store and manage critical data. They also employ ERP-integrated output workflows to ensure printed materials are generated accurately and on time. Even brief downtime, due to incompatible software, maintenance, or untimely server upgrades, can cascade into multiple supply chain bottlenecks.
A study on challenges and barriers for software implementation, determined that from a technical standpoint, the integration of a manufacturing execution system (MES) or management information system (MIS) with legacy ERP systems creates barriers because the technologies are incompatible, making it difficult to connect and exchange information.
Lack of Visibility
Disparate issues, such as slow system processes, a production line waiting on a label, and a stalled print queue, go unnoticed for a long time until someone traces them to a systemic infrastructure gap. Therefore, sufficient visibility across the supply chain is necessary for business units to avoid these kinds of oversights. However, global supply chains have evolved into complex, multitier networks, which contributes to the lack of reliable insight into the operation’s supply chain.
Over Reliance on IT
Manufacturing environments often function with legacy print servers and distributed devices across multiple facilities. When a printer or print server malfunctions, it usually falls to the IT teams to restore printer functionality, printer drivers, and output workflows. However, each day, IT teams are tasked with several critical organizational and operational tasks, making print- and output management-related issues a lower priority.